To Your Lordships' Telegram No. 104 of June 30.
Referring to the proposed railway from Canton to Kowloon and more particularly to the projected line relative to the Shanghai-Peking railway, it seems to be advisable that the line should remain between Canton and Kowloon.
Endlos 3 mi no. appears to be an unrelated fragment and No 128 (P.) and Y. S dpur Co 127 seem to be file references or codes, potentially No128(P.) and Y.Sdpur Co127.
A telegram from riders of... is mentioned but the content is incomplete.
$
Endlos 3 mi no.
Telegram of 128627. from
riders of...
No 128 (P.).
f
#Y. S
dpur Co
127
Sir. 2 Satow (the mon
Peking. July. 5. 1905.
to Your Lordships Belegram N. 104
Referring Ke set of June
The 30
reclway from particularly
To the
Pelepas
of
relative to the
projected
Canton to Kowloon
proposed
Me
Shanghai, it seems to
Peking.
should remain
in
Kowloon and more
retwen
เ
A
of mi2 Ross to
advisable that m2 Ross
No comments yet.
Private notes are available after approval.